Cosmological argument: Difference between revisions

From ReformedWiki.org, the wiki for Reformed Christianity
Maury (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Maury (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:


==Objections To Cosmological arguement and Rebuttals==  
==Objections To Cosmological arguement and Rebuttals==  
{{sbs|Objections|Rebuttals}}
 


{{syl
{{syl

Revision as of 13:17, 10 April 2026

The cosmological argument is an argument that everything in existence must have a cause except for one first cause (which is what we call God).

Versions of the argument

Kalam cosmological arguement

Premise 1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause. Premise 2: The universe began to exist. Premise 3: Therefore, the universe has a cause. Conclusion: Therefore, God is the cause of the universe.

Leibnizian cosmological argument

Premise 1: Anything that exists has an explanation of its existence, either in the necessity of its own nature or in an external explanation. Premise 2: The universe has an explanation for its existence, and that explanation is grounded in a necessary being. Premise 3: The universe exists. Premise 4: Therefore, the universe has an explanation of its existence (from 1, 3). Premise 5: Therefore, the explanation of the existence of the universe is grounded in a necessary being (from 2, 4). Conclusion: Therefore, God (a necessary being) exists.

Objections To Cosmological arguement and Rebuttals

Who created God?



Fails to realize that uncaused-causer isn't an opinion, it's a necessity, also God exists outside space and time.